When monitoring a TURP patient with a continuous bladder irrigation, which finding indicates a potential catheter obstruction?

Prepare for the HESI 366 Test. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each offering hints and explanations. Get exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

When monitoring a TURP patient with a continuous bladder irrigation, which finding indicates a potential catheter obstruction?

Explanation:
When a patient has continuous bladder irrigation after TURP, keeping the catheter patent is the focus. The most direct indication of a catheter obstruction is finding clots in the catheter or drainage line. Clots can clog the lumen, reducing or stopping drainage and irrigation flow, which signals a blockage that needs attention. Other signs like the color of the urine can be expected to be bloody after TURP and don’t alone prove obstruction. Vital sign changes—heart rate or blood pressure—are nonspecific and can be caused by pain, bleeding, or fluid shifts rather than a blocked catheter. So, the presence of clots in the catheter is the best indicator of obstruction and prompts assessment and intervention to restore patency.

When a patient has continuous bladder irrigation after TURP, keeping the catheter patent is the focus. The most direct indication of a catheter obstruction is finding clots in the catheter or drainage line. Clots can clog the lumen, reducing or stopping drainage and irrigation flow, which signals a blockage that needs attention.

Other signs like the color of the urine can be expected to be bloody after TURP and don’t alone prove obstruction. Vital sign changes—heart rate or blood pressure—are nonspecific and can be caused by pain, bleeding, or fluid shifts rather than a blocked catheter. So, the presence of clots in the catheter is the best indicator of obstruction and prompts assessment and intervention to restore patency.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy